<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workshop of the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/workshop-of-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/workshop-of-the-world/</link>
	<description>One Damn Thing Leads to Another</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/workshop-of-the-world/#comment-13461</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/workshop-of-the-world/#comment-13461</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the link is busted (send me the right one and I'll post it).

The number, assuming it's true and I suspect it is, makes good sense. A billion Chinese, 300 million Americans, 700 million Chinese peasants with low carbon (though high soot) footprint. 0 American peasants.

As more and more Chinese come out of peasanthood and into the urban economies the carbon signature of China will rise. As more Chinese move from labourer to factory work to the middle class, the carbon fingerprint will increase. And, if I was even slightly concerned about manmade CO2 as a greenhouse gas I might think this is a bad thing. But as I am not my only concern is that the Chinese are going to have to go through the "killing fogs" which characterized Industrial Revolution (and beyond) England before they get a handle on their pollution problems. China is going to get very much worse before it gets any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the link is busted (send me the right one and I&#8217;ll post it).</p>
<p>The number, assuming it&#8217;s true and I suspect it is, makes good sense. A billion Chinese, 300 million Americans, 700 million Chinese peasants with low carbon (though high soot) footprint. 0 American peasants.</p>
<p>As more and more Chinese come out of peasanthood and into the urban economies the carbon signature of China will rise. As more Chinese move from labourer to factory work to the middle class, the carbon fingerprint will increase. And, if I was even slightly concerned about manmade CO2 as a greenhouse gas I might think this is a bad thing. But as I am not my only concern is that the Chinese are going to have to go through the &#8220;killing fogs&#8221; which characterized Industrial Revolution (and beyond) England before they get a handle on their pollution problems. China is going to get very much worse before it gets any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fitzpatrick</title>
		<link>http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/workshop-of-the-world/#comment-13456</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fitzpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/workshop-of-the-world/#comment-13456</guid>
		<description>The United States, on a per person basis, emits four times as much carbon as
China. See the numbers &lt;a href="http://www.apathy.net/stories/us_still_largest_per_capita_greenhouse_g
as_emitter"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States, on a per person basis, emits four times as much carbon as<br />
China. See the numbers <a href="http://www.apathy.net/stories/us_still_largest_per_capita_greenhouse_g<br />
as_emitter">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
