She looked really scared, in fact his behavior bothers me a great deal. I still think those detained without just cause need to file a class action lawsuit, it’s the only way they put those who abused their police powers that day on trial. It’s not like she can’t prove she did as she was edicted by officer bully.
Very interesting column from an Ontario Conservative Randy Hillier – Opinion: G20 crackdown reeks of tyranny
“They both use the common theme that upholding law and order required usurping our civil liberties. Any elementary school student knows these are not mutually exclusive — in fact, they are wholly interdependent. As numerous failed dictatorships have proven, you cannot have law and order without civil liberties.”
Wow. Shocking that when you show up only to deliberately antagonize a line of police officers that you not walk away. I’m sure the poor pretty little thing got thrown in the can for the night and released without charges. Cry me a river.
I would posit that if you started blowing bubbles in an officers face at any time other than during the G8, that you’d have a lot worse happen.
I wonder if the above posters would be so flippant if their wives, mothers or daughters got hauled off the street merely for blowing bubbles or not bowing down in subserviance to a police officer? Is that the kind of nation you want to live in then go stand beside the phucking leftarded progressives because they expect Canadians to bow down to their demented loopy logic without putting up a fuss and apprently law and order Cons expect us to simper before law enforcement meekly accepting cops who abuse their authority.
I wonder if the above posters would be so flippant if their wives, mothers or daughters got hauled off the street merely for blowing bubbles or not bowing down in subserviance to a police officer?
Yes.
Why should their public behaviour, especially towards peace officers, be any different from the way they are expected to act towards me at home ?
There is a break in the filming between the discussion and the arrest. What happened during the break in filming? You obviously know because you have convicted the officer in your mind already. The video itself actually does not give any indication as to why that person was arrested.
When someone shows a video on youtube with a section obviously omitted, there is usually a reason. That reason is often linked the the position that they are trying to advocate.
Watched the video and have made the following observations. The young girl is very sweet, but naive, she meant no harm but putting herself in such a confrontation under these circumstances is begging for possible trouble. This is especially so when in the midst of people in authority suffering from “ATL” syndrome. The officer in question was exhibiting an adrenalin rush because of the provocation. His judgment and demeanor was clouded with feelings of authority and superiority behind the protection of his badge. One can only imagine what sort of behaviour he would exhibit “off camera” under more serious circumstances when dealing with the public…... ATL is “Above The Law” .... and one comment on the female officer present…”she deserves praise for showing civilized restraint and calm in dealing with the situation” ....one can only wonder what she was thinking about her fellow officer….most likely embarrassment….
July 13th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
She looked really scared, in fact his behavior bothers me a great deal. I still think those detained without just cause need to file a class action lawsuit, it’s the only way they put those who abused their police powers that day on trial. It’s not like she can’t prove she did as she was edicted by officer bully.
July 13th, 2010 at 4:08 pm
Very interesting column from an Ontario Conservative Randy Hillier – Opinion: G20 crackdown reeks of tyranny
“They both use the common theme that upholding law and order required usurping our civil liberties. Any elementary school student knows these are not mutually exclusive — in fact, they are wholly interdependent. As numerous failed dictatorships have proven, you cannot have law and order without civil liberties.”
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontog20summit/article/834320—opinion-g20-crackdown-reeks-of-tyranny
July 13th, 2010 at 5:45 pm
BOOO HOO
July 13th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Wow. Shocking that when you show up only to deliberately antagonize a line of police officers that you not walk away. I’m sure the poor pretty little thing got thrown in the can for the night and released without charges. Cry me a river.
I would posit that if you started blowing bubbles in an officers face at any time other than during the G8, that you’d have a lot worse happen.
July 14th, 2010 at 9:44 am
Right concept – wrong tool...
July 14th, 2010 at 10:09 am
I wonder if the above posters would be so flippant if their wives, mothers or daughters got hauled off the street merely for blowing bubbles or not bowing down in subserviance to a police officer? Is that the kind of nation you want to live in then go stand beside the phucking leftarded progressives because they expect Canadians to bow down to their demented loopy logic without putting up a fuss and apprently law and order Cons expect us to simper before law enforcement meekly accepting cops who abuse their authority.
July 14th, 2010 at 12:07 pm
I wonder if the above posters would be so flippant if their wives, mothers or daughters got hauled off the street merely for blowing bubbles or not bowing down in subserviance to a police officer?
Yes.
Why should their public behaviour, especially towards peace officers, be any different from the way they are expected to act towards me at home ?
July 15th, 2010 at 8:11 am
There is a break in the filming between the discussion and the arrest. What happened during the break in filming? You obviously know because you have convicted the officer in your mind already. The video itself actually does not give any indication as to why that person was arrested.
When someone shows a video on youtube with a section obviously omitted, there is usually a reason. That reason is often linked the the position that they are trying to advocate.
July 18th, 2010 at 5:03 am
Watched the video and have made the following observations. The young girl is very sweet, but naive, she meant no harm but putting herself in such a confrontation under these circumstances is begging for possible trouble. This is especially so when in the midst of people in authority suffering from “ATL” syndrome. The officer in question was exhibiting an adrenalin rush because of the provocation. His judgment and demeanor was clouded with feelings of authority and superiority behind the protection of his badge. One can only imagine what sort of behaviour he would exhibit “off camera” under more serious circumstances when dealing with the public…... ATL is “Above The Law” .... and one comment on the female officer present…”she deserves praise for showing civilized restraint and calm in dealing with the situation” ....one can only wonder what she was thinking about her fellow officer….most likely embarrassment….