COOL

Welcome to the net jihad.

They are a sly bunch, I’ll give em that much, but what they fail to realize, is the further they push us back, it gives the rest of os wise enough to group and educate ourselves on not only the mistakes politicaly on how we got to this point, but also in terms of Uniting, and defeating true enemies of freedom of expression (within moral ethics ofcourse) truth and liberty.

No matter the cost.

My prediction, is this. When Canadians start mass flooding to the US, once “they’ve” successfuly (if we do nothing) take us over from within, only then will people understand what United really means, and it’s not some silly catch phrase attached to American’s home land.

For us Canadians, it should be True Patriot Love.

I’m not feeling the love brother, haven’t for a very long time.

“Yikes…sockpuppet first year law students.

Sad or scary? Well more sad than scary.

Grownups use their own names and make, at least, a tiny attempt not to beclown themselves by getting basic things like citizenship wrong.

With friends like this the vast majority of moderate Canadian Muslims need no further enemies.

Three words law dudes: “abuse of process”. You will find it sounds in costs in, well, real courts.”

Interestingly, Magicstats put up a post and traced the IP of “Canadian dude” back to – hold on – the law is cool admin page!

Guess there really is a new definition of spam…

“And looking at the other posts on this blog and the others in his fan base, the contents are as bad and at times worse than Steyn’s.

You guys are a bunch of scary people down there in the U.S. Keep your notions of freedom on that side of the border, we don’t want it.”

Who is this “we” buddy? I am as Canadian as you are.

It is possible for Canadians to a) believe in freedom of speech (it is in the Charter – if you are a Law Student you might want to look it up), b) believe that Human Rights tribunals should not be dealing with speech issues which is the position of Alan Borovoy the General Counsel (that would be lawyer cd) of the Canadian Civil Liberties Union.

Ben, I think xenophobe is a bit broad brush: it is literally a fear of strangers. My fear, and loathing thank you very much, is of strangers who want to kill or convert me to whatever whacky bit of religious lunacy they are flogging. Muslims, Mormons, JWs, Scientologists, fundamentalist Christians – if I don’t know you and you want to convert me or, worse, kill me, I will make every effort to keep you off my street and out of the public square – you are, however, welcome, to practice your faith up to the point of calling for the death of “Jews, Crusaders, homosexuals and apostates” in your sermon of the week. My support for free speech stops at the point of incitement to murder.

And looking at the other posts on this blog and the others in his fan base, the contents are as bad and at times worse than Steyn’s.

You guys are a bunch of scary people down there in the U.S. Keep your notions of freedom on that side of the border, we don’t want it.

“David Reese from Alabama submitted a comment to the Law Is Cool blog, which has provided a platform to the Muslim law students trying to strong-arm Maclean’s magazine. The powers that be at the blog altered his comment—twice—and then banned him”

How they can demand space to respond and then deny it to others—it’s like asking the Spanish about their foreign policy regarding Gibraltar and their little plot of land across the straits in Morocco.

Either a third party can have his or her demand for response space enforced by the state, or he or she can’t. Steyn, you, and I are in the latter camp, as we are old-fashioned sorts who like to believe in a free society.

As for their charge that you’re a xenophobe, however—I think you’re probably guilty as charged. (Not that I don’t sometimes agree with you...)