Time to buy a clue
The delightfully inarticulate law students over at Law is Cool have had twenty or so comments on one of their posts defending the right of the Muslim students to take Mark Steyn and Mcleans Magazine before the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
Apparently these are the ESL law students as no one who actually speaks English could write this chiller of a sentence:
“Part of Steyn’s expressed tactics include spamming government officials, media, and other figures. They have done the same here.”
And, I assume, they will also be taking that remedial internet course: spam has a fairly precise meaning. What our wannabe legal beagles might be talking about is trolling (which I usually find actually cashes out as a way of slagging someone whose arguments you cannot refute) or astroturfing.
However, the law students, being deeply committed to the values of free speech, have cut off comments on all Steyn related posts. Brave! Stouthearted…just the sort of people you’d want fighting your corner in a divorce action or a Charter case.
Written by jay on December 23rd, 2007 with
13 comments.
Read more articles on Canadian Politics and law.
- [+] Digg: Feature this article
- [+] Del.icio.us: Bookmark this article
- [+] Furl: Bookmark this article
#1. December 23rd, 2007, at 3:49 AM.
Thank you for your comments. Despite your apparent xenophobia, the first language of all of our full-time student contributors is English.
The spam comments were deleted. Too bad you didn’t get a chance to read them before passing judgement. And yes, those comments would constitute the definition of spam provided.
The use of the world troll is mentioned as well if you go back and read, and is directed to the other comments that were retained as you indicate.
It was the spam, many of which included explicit profanity and/or links to inappropriate sites, that necessitated the decision to shut down comments.