The liar Kinsella wants my address

Kathy Shaidle
#1. January 24th, 2008, at 12:14 AM.

I seem to recall Kinsella getting mad at a local journalist for “telling people where he lived” in a newspaper article.

After he’d told the same reporter, during an on the record interview (?)… where he lived. Or something.

Kathy Shaidle
#2. January 24th, 2008, at 12:15 AM.

Sorry I posted too soon. You mentioned it in your post.

I need just ONE more coffee. Yeah…

Hans
#3. January 24th, 2008, at 12:34 AM.

He makes quite a show of saying he is able to track IP addresses of folks (”haters” no doubt) who send him emails, the implication being that he is going to track them down and bully them, I guess, but he can’t get a fix on your address for “service”? Maybe he isn’t as all-powerful as he would like us to think? On the other hand, he’s a lawyer so surely in his legal career he’s had a few deadbeat clients who had to track down to a pay an overdue bill or two. I think in Ontario they call them process servers and they serve papers on people all the time. I think one of those process server outfits could do it. It seems to me kind of deceitful to pretend that not being able to find you is the reason not to serve some legal paper on you, if that’s the case.

mgl
#4. January 24th, 2008, at 1:02 AM.

Warren is a lawsuit-happy crybaby with a glass jaw. For all his puffed-up “ass-kicking” bluster, he sure can’t take a punch.

Warren Kinsella
#5. January 24th, 2008, at 1:18 AM.

Dear Mr. Currie:

I undertake, as an officer of the court, not to publicize your address anywhere at any time, and pledge only to rely upon it for the purposes of service under the relevant Rules.

You may send it to [the above-noted] email account, as you now have my undertaking, above. Failure to follow through on your offer, made online, may amount to evading service.

Yours sincerely,

Warren Kinsella

P.S. This email has also been sent to a known Gmail account used by Jay Currie, put is posted here in the event that account is no longer active. Many thanks.

Security
#7. January 24th, 2008, at 1:49 AM.

Wow, you trust that scraped off shit with your address? You are either extremely confident in your position or perhaps a little crazy, neither of which I percieve as a bad thing in this particular instance. (Or maybe the address you sent him is that of a Hells Angels clubhouse).

In any event, please lower the hammer on this fucker and post the remains for all to see. On top of his other glorious flaws, he’s probably a Leaf fan. And you know how hard it can be to scrape THAT shit off.

James Goneaux
#9. January 24th, 2008, at 2:22 AM.

It isn’t his alleged lies (he is a Liberal lawyer, it shouldn’t be much surprise) that bother me as much as his proven hypocrisy.

Going on and on (like all rich liberals) about how unimportant wealth is, stating rather pompously that “he doesn’t live in a gated community” (paraphrase), but living in a million dollar house.

Actually POSING for a picture on the balcony of the home for the Toronto Star with his family, then complaining about privacy!

But folks should be careful: as odious a twerp as this guy is, just read his “writing” to see how to do it. Put in lots of “alleges”, ask disingenuous questions, remark that tenuous links you can’t possibly prove are just “coincidences, probably”…etc.

Blazingcatfur
#10. January 24th, 2008, at 2:33 AM.

Cheezus, Kinsella what a shit-head.

ld
#11. January 24th, 2008, at 2:41 AM.

Well it seem you finally got what you wanted from him, not sure why you’ve pushed so hard tho. Good luck.

Mike Brock
#13. January 24th, 2008, at 3:24 AM.

Jay, can you pop me an email when you get the chance (so I have yours)? You can use the email in my comment here.

sf
#14. January 24th, 2008, at 4:04 AM.

Kinsella has no case. Not to mention, for someone who throws insults around as much as he does, it’s amusing to see how quickly he likes to jump into the courts.

Blazingcatfur
#15. January 24th, 2008, at 4:56 AM.

Jay I just linked to your post. If I may be of service in any way please let me know.

Kathy Shaidle
#16. January 24th, 2008, at 5:04 AM.

Jay have you considered changing this site to subscription only?

Because you could ’sell tickets’ for this!

Dr.Dawg
#17. January 24th, 2008, at 7:05 AM.

Man, more popcorn, please.

Who says the blogosphere isn’t entertaining? Hell, I’d give up watching wresting in a heartbeat for more of this. Well, no, maybe not.

I’ve never heard of anyone being sued successfully for being called a “liar” before. Come on, you two, shake hands and go to your rooms. Good grief.

rico
#18. January 24th, 2008, at 7:46 AM.

Dear Warren,

Please shut your yapping Liberal piehole.
Thank you.

Fenris Badwulf
#20. January 24th, 2008, at 4:53 PM.

looks like someone is going to have a duel

Hans
#21. January 24th, 2008, at 6:23 PM.

I can’t decide whether his post above is funny or pathetic. I hope you are able to provide updates on whether you actually get sued and what happens after that.

darrell epp
#22. January 24th, 2008, at 9:38 PM.

man, I cannot believe Warren has a career. crazy world. john witherspoon’s at http://www.darrellepp.com

dinosaur
#24. January 26th, 2008, at 3:45 AM.

I wouldn’t give that weasel my address under any circumstances, make him pay someone to find it.

It’s not like he’s a police officer or a sheriff’s officer, serving a summons.

Hope he doesn’t post it on the net.