The Accomodation Equation
I mean: surely if the anti-hijab folk are expected to interpret this symbol (which, to repeat, the commission admits is controversial) as an invitation “to connect with someone,” then it must follow that the hair in every militant feminist’s armpits is an invitation to the pro-hijab folk “to connect” as well. How, after all, is it fair to privilege the outward displays of backwardness of one person over those of another? EMG
EMG is just so mean using their language so deliciously…”is it fair to privilege…” Snort!
The poor bastards at the CHRC and in PCland generally are in for a world o’pain the very instant an old time hijabist attempts to privilege himself on, say, Judy Rebick’s PC pit pubes.
May 21st, 2008 at 9:37 pm
“pit pubes” ?????..lost me there perfesser…..’pits’ are oxsters to me and ‘pubes’ are mons venerii…..as for judy rebick having both or neither hirsute or otherwise i cannot speculate….nor do i wish to contemplate upon.
May 22nd, 2008 at 5:00 am
The hijab is a blatant symbol of isolation and rejection, they don’t want group hugs or acceptance from a society they view as Godless and unclean.
And thanks for the “oxters” reference, a great word which I never hear and isn’t in my cheap ass dictionary.
May 22nd, 2008 at 9:09 pm
yes indeed…’oxters’ for armpits…and i like using ‘dugs’ for those big round things woemen have on their fronts….