<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spooky Action at a Distance&#8230;.Cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/spooky-action-at-a-distancecool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/spooky-action-at-a-distancecool/</link>
	<description>One Damn Thing Leads to Another</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/spooky-action-at-a-distancecool/#comment-5049</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaycurrie.info-syn.com/spooky-action-at-a-distancecool/#comment-5049</guid>
		<description>They said that light is the carrier of the entaglement. Doesn't that mean the information can't travel faster than light?

Even if the action can seem to operate faster than the speed of light, that doesn't necessarily mean we can use it to send information. There are materials with indices of refraction less than one, but even though a light pulse actually exits the material before it enters it, no information can be transmitted that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They said that light is the carrier of the entaglement. Doesn&#8217;t that mean the information can&#8217;t travel faster than light?</p>
<p>Even if the action can seem to operate faster than the speed of light, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean we can use it to send information. There are materials with indices of refraction less than one, but even though a light pulse actually exits the material before it enters it, no information can be transmitted that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
