Quick pick…who do the Greens think is a

“right wing white supremacist”

He’s in this highly incriminating picture…all you need to do is spot him…like John Bennett of the Green Party did. Here’s your hint:

white supremacist

RJ Jago...white supremacist and, God Willing, litigant.

John Bennett…is moron too strong a word? How about asshat? Nope, not quite right…wait…got it.

Green!

(Oh, you have to go to Jago’s site to find out which of these people the Green’s think is a white supremacist.)

9 comments to Quick pick…who do the Greens think is a

  1. Alan
    October 1st, 2008 at 3:23 am

    Just to be fair to the utterly unhinged out there and absolutely nothing to do with Jago and his excellent blog, I was once in court when a band of white supremacists were brought before the judge. As they pled their various pleas, the judge did make a point of asking each if they understood what white supremacy was as, whatever “white” is, a segment of the group were simply not. One was quite incensed with the others when it was explained.

  2. Robert McClelland
    October 1st, 2008 at 3:41 am

    I don’t read Jago’s site so I’m not saying he is one, but you don’t have to be white to be a white supremacist. I’ve encountered numerous non-white people who espouse white supremacist dogma. Besides that, there’s a new breed of supremacist cropping up; the western (culture) supremacist. People like Steyn fit that mold. Since these two types of supremacist use similar rhetoric it’s easy to confuse the two.

  3. Alan
    October 1st, 2008 at 7:57 am

    Whoa! I can only handle so many new conspiracies in one week

  4. DaninVan
    October 1st, 2008 at 8:32 am

    I usually read the ‘comment’ before looking to see who wrote it. No surprise at #2…Robert could simply save a lot of time and energy by offering “Self Loathing” as his universal comment; appropriate for all occasions.

  5. WL Mackenzie Redux
    October 1st, 2008 at 9:01 am

    “but you don’t have to be white to be a white supremacist.”

    The rational alchemy of that conclusion defies reality. Most revisionist dementia does anyway so why are we surprised that the language does not mean what it states any more.

    I suggest the “confusion” is in your definition which has expanded past the self evident limits of the label.

  6. Robert McClelland
    October 2nd, 2008 at 6:53 am

    Supremacism exists in many forms, Alan. Just because you’ve only heard of white supremacism doesn’t make the other forms conspiratorial.

  7. Louise
    October 2nd, 2008 at 11:05 am

    Ya, right, McCelland. He’s not Indian enough for ya, is he. Ya gotta be angry and bitter and down trodden to be an Indian. The Indian Industry depends on it.

  8. dcardno
    October 2nd, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Since these two types of supremacist use similar rhetoric it’s easy to confuse the two

    Yes, I often have the same problem with “progressive” and “too stupid to be left alone.”

  9. Alan
    October 3rd, 2008 at 6:31 am

    LOL! Like I need education on that point. That is gold.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>