I have done some googling but cannot for the life of me find any indication that Hughes was actually called an anti-Semite by anyone from either Kent to the Jewish organizations she accuses.
I found the article Farber wrote for the National Post where he makes a point to write that CJC was NOT suggesting Hughes is an anti-Semite in fact he gave her an opportunity to recant her uncritical view that Jews had prior knowledge of the WTC attack. So what gives with this law suit?
What a confusing story. No names, other than Kent, no real examples ( I’ll be damned if I can find much evidence on the net for her accusations)....can anyone show where she has actually been “libeled” and by who and how???
June 24th, 2009 at 4:00 am
I have done some googling but cannot for the life of me find any indication that Hughes was actually called an anti-Semite by anyone from either Kent to the Jewish organizations she accuses.
I found the article Farber wrote for the National Post where he makes a point to write that CJC was NOT suggesting Hughes is an anti-Semite in fact he gave her an opportunity to recant her uncritical view that Jews had prior knowledge of the WTC attack. So what gives with this law suit?
June 24th, 2009 at 6:55 am
What a confusing story. No names, other than Kent, no real examples ( I’ll be damned if I can find much evidence on the net for her accusations)....can anyone show where she has actually been “libeled” and by who and how???
June 25th, 2009 at 8:25 am
Just curious: Did you mean deserts? Or desserts? Actually, either one works.