How it should happen
To Steyn’s credit, he may have offered the first olive branch when he said as I was closing the show, “would you guys like to go for dinner?” One of the lawyers immediately said, “No!” They may not have broken bread, but they did continue the dialogue.What became clear is that the rancor that started the evening was gone by the end of it. We’re now trying to see whether we can bring all four participants back some time towards the end of the month, in hopes of having a somewhat calmer discussion about the actual arguments in Steyn’s book. We didn’t get to much of that last night because so much time was taken up with questions about whether Maclean’s was practising good journalism or not. steve paikin
No legal bullshit, no complaints…a conversation.
The Socks are learning a lesson which, if they have the wit to get it, will stand them in good stead in Canada. The lesson is simply this - I can disagree with you but I can still want to have you sit down to dinner. That is civilized. The Socks have a choice, be civilized or be the butt of thousands of jokes and slurs as to their understanding of the law, of Canada and, frankly, of good manners.
Whether it is on TVO or before the SCC, the Socks will learn their manners and how a civilized disagreement is carried out. If they do not they are not worth having in Canada. For fun and fury - without the obligation to be polite or civilized - there are plenty of Islamic Republics which will be more congenial.
Written by jay on May 8th, 2008 with
6 comments.
Read more articles on culture and free speech.
- [+] Digg: Feature this article
- [+] Del.icio.us: Bookmark this article
- [+] Furl: Bookmark this article
#1. May 9th, 2008, at 12:12 AM.
Perhaps the socks will learn enough from the second exposure with the free press stunt pilot to “get it”.
“It” being the concept of being a functional member of a civil liberal democratic society who do not threaten your fellow citizens with ruinous heavy handed government intervention every time someone disagrees with you….and that having a differing opinion is not “racism” or “hate” it’s called exercising a right to dissent…something evidently lacking in the sock’s cultural maturity.