Comments on: Hmmmm….

By: Kathy Shaidle

Kathy Shaidle — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:15:22 +0000

I love it when Dawg bravely calls bullshit on stuff.

This is the same man who tried, unsuccessfully, to get the blogosphere and the mainstream media interested in a completely bogus, long-ago debunked “Indian mass graves” story last week.

His judgment is not what I’d call awe inspiring.

By: jay

jay — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:07:03 +0000

As a matter of speculation I would be very surprised if the higher ups at the CHRC knew very much about what the kids in Hate Crimes investigations were doing. And, I suspect, that as they begin digging they are going to be more than a little unhappy at the shenanigans they uncover.

However, it has gone well beyond the point where an internal investigation will suffice.

It is time for a full judicial inquiry into the activities of the s. 13 unit of the CHRC. With a judge, professional investigators, real lawyers and real transcipts.

By: DCardno

DCardno — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:10:17 +0000

Dawg:
I thought that it was established that a “Jadewarr” posting was made from the IP assigned to Ms Hechme’s computer, irrespective of the timestamp provided by Lemire, whether it can be falsified or not. If that is the case, then an identity controlled by CHRC staff made a posting on someone else’s internet connection - the assertion that they did nothing wrong remains a jaw-dropper. If it is not the case, and the attribution of the posing to Ms Hechme’s IP address depends on the timestamp provided by Lemire (if it is possible to manipulate it, or if can inadvertently be wrong) then you are correct, and the CHRC’s postion becomes understandable.

By: Four Horses

Four Horses — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:02:08 +0000

Well, LS, are we now seeing that “hidden agenda”, we have heard so much about ?

The government is not sitting idly by - they are proactive in the Lemire railroad case with their representative from Nicholson’s office helping the CHRC to try and hide the unsavory dealings.

Give me all the stories and excuses they want, that this was a continuation of Cotler’s good-bye gift - I don’t buy it. I don’t think many do.

One would have to be blind and illiterate not to take notice of the unlawfulness and injustices done to date. Either that, or there is an “agenda” …….

By: Dr.Dawg

Dr.Dawg — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:36:12 +0000

dcardno:

I’ve seen this popping up elsewhere too: the CHRC says they did nothing wrong: but YOU know, for a fact, that they committed a criminal act; therefore, the CHRC is claiming that a criminal act is nothing of the kind.

No, they are not. They are saying that their staff did not commit the crime.

Now, get this straight: there is NO proof, NONE whatever, that CHRC was involved in any of this. We are taking Lemire at his word about the time of the Jadewarr posting–everything else, including the Bell log information, flowed from that.

Can timestamps be altered, or not? The certainly can be on Blogger.

By: The LS from SK

The LS from SK — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:18:18 +0000

Well Four Horses,

That Skunk stinks to high heaven but what smells even worse is the non-reaction of Harper, Nicholson, Baird and others including the RCMP to this daily embarresment.

If they have nothing to hide (including political links, trade offs and favours of Lynch (a Liberal) and Hall to embedded bureaucrats) then this should have resulted in a Judicial Eguiry/Investigation a long time ago.

By: Four Horses

Four Horses — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:57:07 +0000

“What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.”

~ Abraham Lincoln

By: dcardno

dcardno — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:52:33 +0000

What’s really interesting is her contention that the connection was secured. It could be that her router was secured with WEP (which apparently is about as secure as a cereal-box decoder ring) - but even that indicates a more-than-trivial effort to find a fresh IP on Jadewarr’s part. If it was properly secured then I don’t know what to make of it - although how the CHRC counsel can claim that they have done nothing untoward, nothing wrong in theft of service remains a bit of a jaw-dropper.