Colby Cosh Breaks Wind

In the National Post no less:

It is starting to look as though wind cannot meet more than a fraction of our energy demand even if other issues with the technology, like esthetics and wildlife impacts, are ignored. The problem, as engineers skeptical of wind power have been yelping for decades, is that power usage and production constantly have to be balanced in an electrical grid. Adding too much unstable, unpredictable power to the system creates a risk of failure and cascading blackouts. In fact, the EU is investigating the possible role of Germany’s heavy wind-dependence in causing a Nov. 6 blackout that hit 10 million Europeans. national post

Cosh cites a series of depressing facts about Jack Layton’s favorite Kyoto solution. But mainly the problem is that wind is predictably unreliable.

At some point people are going to realize that modern energy solutions are going to use a variety of technologies to reduce demand at the margins. Big wind may be one of them, little wind - the mini-turbine on your roof top - may be another. But the one which I am inclined to think has the most promise is household and neighbourhood geothermal for heating and cooling. It is always the same temperature six to ten feet underground and the differential between surface temperature and below ground allow heating in winter and cooling in summer. Yes, the front end costs are large. yes it is tough to retrofit; but the constant heat of the ground is potentially a way of providing all household heating and cooling, carbon free, everywhere in Canada but the High Arctic.

Written by jay on November 22nd, 2006 with 6 comments.
Read more articles on tech.

Related articles

6 comments

Read the comments left by other users below, or:

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Alan
#1. November 22nd, 2006, at 8:58 AM.

Let’s see if this commenting works now.

I have done some electricity work and there is one thing that can be done with it that big wind would be able to do on a reasonable basis - pump water up hill. That is one primary way large amounts of electricity can be stored behind a dam (or over-heated systems can get some relief.) So it is not only that there needs to be a mix of systems each providing power but also integration of those alternative systems. Saying big wind is a flop is like saying asphalt was a flop before the internal combustion engine…but Cosh is so MSM and mini-MSM at that, writing for the NP.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Classic
#2. November 22nd, 2006, at 9:56 PM.

_I’d like to see an internal wind tunnel generator system developed.
_Also, I don’t get why today’s wind mills don’t get doubled up. They seem to me like the old floppy disk; first they were 360k, then double-sided, then double-density into 1.44mb.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Sean
#3. November 23rd, 2006, at 12:37 AM.

“But mainly the problem is that wind is predictably unreliable.”

The hell you say. Go on vacation with the McCormicks and I’ll guaran-damn-tee you gale force winds wherever we wind up.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com jay
#4. November 25th, 2006, at 7:17 AM.

Alan, I agree with you on the water storage concept. But that gets expensive when you start scaling it up.

Classic, I am not entirely sure that a row of wind turbines would work because of turbulence issues. However I say that as a sailor rather than a scientist. As Burton will tell you, sitting every so slightly behind and to the lea of a competitor in a sailboat race demonstrates just how little power “used” wind has.

Sean, I will make sure there is a place for you in any boat I am sailing…a predictable source of wind and opinion, but I repeat myself.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Sean
#5. November 25th, 2006, at 8:48 AM.

“a predictable source of wind and opinion”

You’re off the X-mas card list, mister! :-p~~~~~~

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com jay
#6. November 26th, 2006, at 4:14 AM.

Sean, now I know why I missed my comments working…

Leave your comment...

If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:




You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .