17 Comments so far

1. James Goneaux on March 24, 2008 12:09 pm

   Maybe someone can use the new Kook Kinsella Kamera. Kneepads included!

2. john begley on March 24, 2008 3:55 pm

   so what’s superduper K-man expecting …the Marks brothers ?……..i tell you,he’s SO out of it..he prolly thinks “A Day at the Races’ is the NFB sequel to ‘Birth of a Nation.”

3. Mordechai on March 24, 2008 5:49 pm

   No jay actually you can take pics anywhere in this country. True, as in any Court unless you have its permission, pics are forbidden during the proceedings.

4. Hank on March 24, 2008 7:38 pm

   It would help to promote further guilt by association. Actually there are many photos of Obama shaking hands with Rev. Wright he could use.

5. Dr.Dawg on March 24, 2008 7:50 pm

   Jay, calm down. Spectators in a hearing in session don’t run around shaking people’s hands. WK is obviously referring to breaks, corridors, outside the building and so on.

   It does promise to be Homecoming Week for the far Right. I’m rather looking forward to it. Think Lemire will show up in uniform?

6. john begley on March 24, 2008 8:03 pm

   “i’ll pay more for actual footage”…..??

   pardon the uncharitable cast i put on superduper K-man’s advertisement but would this be a veiled request for measurement of the Marks brother’s respective ’stances’ while using the gentlemen’s conveniences ?

7. WL Mackenzie Redux on March 24, 2008 10:22 pm

   Why the proxy offer?…Wornout can make this do himself, he’s close enough and it’s easier for him than Steyn to be there…why the lack of motivation to get to a confrontation he’s been croaking about so loudly?…is he afraid to confront Steyn face to face with cameras around to record it?…or is that his camera only works in boy’s washrooms?

8. jay on March 25, 2008 12:25 am

   Mordechai, so you might think; but if you read the Members order of May 7th as I recall the ban on photography extends well beyond the hearing room. And, as I recall, cameras and recording devices are banned anywhere in Courthouses in BC.

   Dawg, so far as I am aware Lemire does not have a uniform save the one he wore serving in the Canadian Forces.

   WLMR, good point but when I emailed Wornout to ask if he would be attending he suggested that I “Get a life”. I suspect he is a bit frightened of the very big and scary neo and crypto Nasties. What with his glass jaw and all.

9. Blazingcatfur on March 25, 2008 1:09 am

   Kinsella’s keepers at the CJC wouldn’t let him anywhere near the hearing - they understand his skill set and it has nothing to do with being a competent legal advisor.

10. john begley on March 25, 2008 1:10 am

    glass jaw ?……….hmmmmmmmm…..as runyon or someone described it i prefer to say the ‘chin of a poet”……

    i wonder if superduper K-man has ever seen sid vicious’ version of ‘i did it my way’….i’m sure it’s on youtube…anyhow THAT’S the way a punker manque’ otta handle hisself around nazi types i reckon.

11. christopher rivers on March 25, 2008 1:48 am

    It’s odd that a guy who is supposedly some sort of political strategist has no idea how lame and pathetic this is. But then, that sort of self-awareness would make it hard for him to shave in the morning.
    And dawg, if you think it’s just the “far-right” you’re bickering with, you’re even more unaware than kinsella.

12. Dr.Dawg on March 25, 2008 2:56 am

    Dawg, so far as I am aware Lemire does not have a uniform save the one he wore serving in the Canadian Forces.

    http://tinyurl.com/2ppz8y

13. Dave Tracey on March 25, 2008 3:11 am

    ….and I’ll pay $100 for a pic of Spinsella kissing Chretiens ass.

    Wait, that wouldn’t really be newsworthy now, would it?

14. jay on March 25, 2008 3:23 am

    I stand corrected Dawg…

15. WL Mackenzie Redux on March 25, 2008 4:01 am

    I find it interesting the self professed illuminated “progressives” cannot see the hypocrisy of tarring everyone who opposes CHRC abuses as “nazi sympathizers” ( either outright or in their typical snide innuendo)

    The left is fond of chanting that just because they are opposed to the war in Afghanistan doesn’t mean they are anti Canadian…and I concur.

    Similarly, opposing the current abuse of the HRC system (with individuals and NGOs using it to damage their political and ideological enemies with the power of the state where the legitimate law courts fail to do so as there is no crime to pursue), does NOT mean that we are nazi sympathizers.

    And if you are too partisan blinded to see that if we (let) politically unpopular fringe elements like Lamire to be steam rolled by pseudo-justice systems run by malfeasant partisan zealots, that it can happen to anyone else….well, then you are too fallibly indoctrinated to even claim a valid understanding of civil society and its real threats.

16. Wonder Woman on March 25, 2008 4:21 am

    Whomsoever shall supply the great Warrenator with this supremely devastating evidence of pro-Nazi complicity, better get it laminated first, to protect it from getting *ahem* sticky.

17. Blazingcatfur on March 25, 2008 5:40 am

    Jonathan Kay hits a Home Run: How the human-rights industry somehow convinced Canadians to cheer on an alleged neo-Nazi

    http://tinyurl.com/2svapf