Recent Comments

And what a great idea a carbon tax is, eh?

The consumer response has been modest so far, but the pattern is clear. The number of miles traveled on U.S. roads fell 4.3 percent in March from a year earlier, the U.S. Department of Transportation said on Friday, the sharpest yearly drop on record and the first decline in the month of March since 1979, when the last major oil shock hit drivers.

Sales of gasoline-guzzling sport-utility vehicles have plummeted. The prices for used SUVs dropped by 17.5 percent year-over-year in April, according to Manheim Consulting, which tracks used vehicle sales. Compact cars were up 2 percent. reuters

In the real world, rather than the one inhabited by M. Dion and Gordon Campbell, people respond to price signals. Price of gas goes up you drive less and you look around for a fuel efficient car. That’s how markets work.

I suspect that, in relatively short order, oil prices will fall and with them the price of gasoline. However, the smaller cars will remain.

But while that is going on it is the height of folly to put an additional tax on an already too expensive commodity. In BC we are going to see a carbon tax in June. In the rest of the country, pace Jason “The Economist” Cherniak, M. Dion is promising a special, magical, carbon tax which will not cause the price of gas to go up. It is not clear how this trick is to be performed but if M. Dion says he can suspend the basic law of supply and demand who am I to argue.

2 comments to And what a great idea a carbon tax is, eh?

  1. sjt
    May 25th, 2008 at 8:16 pm

    Oh, great magician, Dion the Magnificent, please explain your carbon tax trick. To non-magical folk like me, it seems that if you add yet another tax to gas, then the price per litre will be higher.

    Glad I don’t live in BC.

  2. dcardno
    May 26th, 2008 at 12:42 am

    The real question is what is the point of a Carbon tax, if it doesn’t make the cost of fuel go up? As you note, it’s that change in price that will drive behaviour and reduce the (supossedly) harm-inducing use of fossil fuels and attendant GHG emissions. The refusal to acknowledge that ‘fighting global warming’ (err… ‘climate change’) will involve economic pain does not mean that pain won’t occur, although it does mean that it will not be planned-for or intelligently managed.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>