Comments on: A Quick Note

By: jay

jay — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:22:39 +0000

And, meanwhile, BCL, on the merits, can I take it that you approve of the use of the Kosher mark to label politicians as approved by Jews? Or that you are down with discribing the display of desription of the pics of terrorists at Sihk parades.

‘Cause if you are you’re a speecher through and through.

By: jay

jay — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:48:06 +0000

“Its crap Dcardno. CHRC will reject, and Jay will whine.”

Wow, is this that threatening BCL? The CHRC has a couple of serious complaints before them. Both, prima facie raise the sorts of issues the CHRC has ruled on before.

What, pray, are their grounds to “reject”?

You cannot imagine how much fun it would be to bring the CHRC before the Federal Court on a Judicial review of their grounds.

Which, I suspect, they are well aware of given the dogs breakfast their own investigators have created. Thanks Lucy.

By: dcardno

dcardno — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:18:10 +0000

Its crap Dcardno. CHRC will reject, and Jay will whine.
Thanks for the incisive analysis, bcl. Care to come up with a reason that the CHRC could use to reject this complaint? I mean, one that wouldn’t invalidate other complaints that they have previously accepted from Mr Warman?

By: john begley

john begley — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:01:58 +0000

ah wake up you mugs…whether they accept the complaint or not it’s a win win for the righties.

you guys are like …oh i can’t remember but he said ‘you pity the plumage but not the dieing bird”.

By: Kathy Shaidle

Kathy Shaidle — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:10:56 +0000

“Fake lawyers…”

Oh man, he’s dumber than I thought.

By: bigcitylib

bigcitylib — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:57:42 +0000

Its crap Dcardno. CHRC will reject, and Jay will whine.

By: Tim Nielsen

Tim Nielsen — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:01:56 +0000

If you insist on sending the CHRC pitbulls after suspects, may I suggest a complaint against Richard Warman? Surely the comments attributed to him that were directed towards Senator Anne Cools could make for a landmark case for the CHRC.

When considering the vile comments posted by Warman ( aka Jadewarr ), the HRC could easily use a case like this to silence its critics about the good work it does by making an example of the likes of the hatefull Mr. Warman.

By: DCardno

DCardno — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:56:59 +0000

I note you studiously avoid discussing the merits, bcl.

By: bigcitylib

bigcitylib — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:50:48 +0000

Fake law talk from fake lawyers.

By: ebt

ebt — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:17:51 +0000

No, it isn’t. (And you’ve left out the punchline to that old joke, which was the cigar guy was prompty charged with arson.)

They have no grounds to reject this complaint. It is brought with exactly the same degree of good faith as every one of Warman’s claims. To accuse Jay Currie of bad faith without grounds is defamatory on its face, but in the circumstances it amounts to a statement that Jay Currie is less honest than an admitted perjurer and proven law-breaker like Warman, which is gravely defamatory.